The World Health Organization (WHO) has modified the definition of a disabled person and people are not happy, to say the least. People without partners are considered infertile by WHO. Although the organization claims that the reason is to encourage a healthy trend in the world but being called Disabled because you are single is really offensive.
Are You Single? Then You Are Classified As DISABLED By The World Health Organization
#1
According to news report published in The Telegraph, WHO has changed its definition of a disabled person and included single people in the category because they are infertile and contributing nothing to the progress of human race.
#2
The organization believes this classification will encourage Vitro fertilization for women and men who want to have a baby but couldn't because they are not in a relationship.
#3
Some people are not happy with this classification at all. Josephine Quintavalle, pro-life activist and director of Comment on Reproductive Ethics said, "This absurd nonsense is not simply re-defining infertility but completely side-lining the biological process and significance of natural intercourse between a man and a woman. How long before babies are created and grown on request completely in the lab?"
#4
However, WHO insists this change is legitimate and positive. Dr. David Adamson, one of the authors of the newest standards, said, "The definition of infertility is now written in such a way that it includes the rights of all individuals to have a family, and that includes single men, single women, gay men, gay women."
#5
He added, "It puts a stake in the ground and says an individual's got a right to reproduce whether or not they have a partner. It fundamentally alters who should be included in this group and who should have access to healthcare. It sets an international legal standard. Countries are bound by it."
#6
American Disabilities Act defines disability as "a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, a person who has a history or record of such an impairment, or a person who is perceived by others as having such an impairment."
#7
Fortunately, this expansion in the definition has not been implemented yet. It is just a suggestion by WHO and it has attracted a lot of criticism from different social circles.
