Rural residents have likely been left out of research and statistics
Scientists Say We Might Be Missing Over A Billion People In Global Population Counts
A surprisingly large portion of the world's population may have been overlooked in census counts so much so that there could actually be over a billion more people living on Earth than what official figures suggest.
While it’s wild to imagine what the planet might be like without humans, the reality is that we’ve long been the main influence on the world around us. Our global population has continued climbing steadily over time.
Right now, the latest estimates show that about 8 billion people live across the globe. But researchers believe that number could hit 9 billion by 2037 and jump to 10 billion by 2058.
That said, according to a recent study published in Nature Communications, we may have already crossed those milestones. The research suggests that rural populations are significantly undercounted—possibly by anywhere from 53% to 84% which means more than a billion people might be missing from global tallies.
As reported by The Independent, researchers pointed out that rural regions often present major challenges for accurate counting:
"Communities in remote locations or impacted by conflict and violence are difficult to access, and census enumerators often face language barriers and resistance to participation."

When this kind of thing happens, it essentially erases people from official records. They end up being labeled as if they don’t exist at all in population stats.
The research team took a closer look at data from 307 dam projects spread across 35 countries. Led by Josias Láng-Ritter from Aalto University in Finland, the study compared the number of people reported as relocated due to dam construction with the population data from the areas they were moved to.
What they found was eye-opening. The new population numbers in those resettled locations didn’t fully add up. In fact, estimates suggest that the population in these areas was underreported by at least 53%, with some places showing miscounts as high as 84%, according to NewScientist.

"We can say that nowadays, population estimates are likely conservative accounting," explained Láng-Ritter, adding, "and we have reason to believe there are significantly more than these 8 billion people."
If governments and agencies were to address the gaps in data collection—especially in rural or isolated places it could lead to real changes. That’s because population numbers aren’t just abstract figures; they shape decisions around transportation, health services, aid distribution, and so much more.
"The impacts may be quite huge, because these datasets are used for very many different kinds of actions," Láng-Ritter pointed out.
In the end, this research isn’t just about revising a number that’s already hard to grasp. It's about how fixing these blind spots could make a real difference for underserved communities and bring about more informed policies on a global scale.