The news of Amber Heard's legal team requesting the court to dismiss the trial comes only days after Heard fired her PR team over the actor's name being covered in a negative light on the internet. However, after hearing arguments from both sides, the judge has dismissed the motion and the trial will continue. Amber Heard is also set to take the stand soon.
Judge Rejects Amber Heard's Motion to Dismiss Johnny Depp Defamation Trial
#1
Johnny Depp's $50 million defamation trial is moving towards its end as Amber Heard is set to take the stand soon. However, it is reported that Heard's legal team motioned the court to dismiss the trial. The judge has denied the request after hearing arguments from both sides.
Last week on Tuesday, Depp's legal team wrapped up the list of their witnesses as they rested their case. However, before Heard's team could begin the trial and bring their witnesses to the stand, her attorney Ben Rottenborn made the case for why the lawsuit should be thrown out, arguing that Depp's side doesn't have enough to prove defamation.
#2
Depp's attorney Benjamin Chew recapped their witness testimonies up to this point, claiming they've shown how Depp's career and reputation was tarnished by Heard's December 2018 Washington Post op-ed, which is the main focus of the case.
Even though Heard did not mention Depp's name in the article, she explicitly wrote "public figure representing domestic abuse" and feeling "the full force of our culture's wrath for women who speak out."
Chew pointed to the court that Heard — who is yet to take the stand — was the abuser in the relationship, not Depp, 58.
In his final statements countering Chew's argument, Rottenborn spoke about "disputed evidence" of abuse in the case presented by the plaintiff, adding of Heard, 36, "I can tell you, she is not the abuser, and if the case moves forward, she and her witnesses will put on even more evidence of the physical abuse she suffered at the hands of Mr. Depp."
Meanwhile, Rottenborn told the court that Depp and his expert witnesses testified that domestic comes in various forms, not only physical. With that, "Even under their standard, the undisputed evidence is that Mr. Depp did commit abuse against Ms. Heard," he said.
After reviewing all of the evidence, Judge Penney Azcarate denied the motions, saying that the "weight of that evidence is up to the fact-finders," meaning she's letting the jury decide whether Heard's op-ed was indeed defamatory as the trial continues.
Johnny Depp lost his libel case in November 2020 in the UK against the British tabloid The Sun which labeled the actor a' wife-beater.' The court upheld the outlet's claims as being "substantially true" and Heard testified to back up the claims. In March 2021, the Pirates of the Caribbean star's attempt to overturn the decision was overruled.
Depp originally filed his defamation case in 2019 however, things got delayed due to the pandemic, until a jury was selected on April 11 in Fairfax, Virginia, and opening statements began the following day.
Heard has previously also asked for the Virginia lawsuit to be dismissed as she made a point to the court that the U.K. judgment should hold sway on the proceedings in the U.S. since both lawsuits center on allegations of Depp as an abuser.
In August, however, Azcarate granted Depp the right to pursue his lawsuit, denying Heard's supplemental plea to dismiss the case.
Daniel Gutenplan — entertainment litigator, defamation expert and a partner at Enenstein Pham & Glass — recently told PEOPLE that Depp has an "uphill battle" in proving defamation. He explained, "Defamation is very hard to prove. First and foremost, truth is an absolute defense to any defamatory statement. So regardless of the alleged defamatory statement, if a defendant can establish that it is true, the defense is going to win."
Gutenplan said Heard's essay never name-dropped Depp and "doesn't detail any specific alleged events or any specific conduct. It is incredibly general in that regard." He also said that winning a defamation case "has to be based on facts," adding: "It can't be based on opinion. And that's where a lot of defamation plaintiffs get in trouble."
One of the Depp's witnesses, their former marriage counselor, Dr. Laurel Anderson, testified to the court that the former couple was engaged in 'mutual abuse' and that she also observed "multiple" small bruises on Heard's face at an in-person meeting.
In audio recordings, Heard has admitted to hitting Depp, and a security guard for Depp testified that he once witnessed Heard punch Depp.
The news of this attempt to motion comes after Heard recently fired her PR team in the middle of the trial.
A crisis communications expert told PEOPLE:
"Depp's team has been on national television and in the court making his case for weeks. Obviously that's going to result in some coverage that I'm sure Amber Heard hasn't liked — but that's just the reality of a situation where the plaintiff gets to go first. To get through crisis situations like these you have to have thick skin, which it seems she does not have by making this change at a very bizarre time when she instead should be going on the offense."
Depp has also told the court that he does not plan on winning the trial, his major goal was to 'let the truth out' as he seeks to clear his name in the trial, which is being televised live via various outlets.
Before the beginning of the trial, Heard said in a statement on Instagram "hopefully when this case concludes, I can move on and so can Johnny. I have always maintained a love for Johnny and it brings me great pain to have to live out the details of our past life together in front of the world."
