Woman Says Workplaces Should Offer 'Dog Moms' The Same Flexibility As Working Parents

A woman has gone viral for claiming that dog moms should be given the same flexibility as working moms by their employers.

Mary Rose Madigan from Sydney penned a personal essay for News.com.au, in which she shared that she struggles to leave her pooch, a black chihuahua named Frank - at home when she heads into the office.

Because of this, she had to enroll her pet in an expensive doggie daycare that costs her a whopping $65 a day plus an additional fee if she is late for pick up.

Credit: Instagram/@maryrosem

"I really wasn’t prepared for the Mum guilt that hits you when you have a dog," Mary explained. She went on to describe how she regularly turns down social plans and rushes out of work everyday to get back to her beloved pet."

"Yes, I can leave him all day, but I feel bloody bad doing it," she wrote.

Mary says taking care of her pet dog has made her realize how difficult it is to be a working mom and her sympathies are with all the women who have kids to take care of. She also mentioned in her essay that as a dog mom, she never gets to enjoy any benefits that working moms enjoy. 

"Even though having a dog has created an entire extra workload in my life (yes, I do it with love but it is still work; anything that involves picking up poo is work), I can’t access any of the flexibility provided to mothers with human children," she wrote.

"I watch as working mums can head off early, introduce flexible hours or work from home more often with absolute envy," Mary added.

Credit: Instagram/@maryrosem

She wrapped up her passionate op-ed by calling for employers across Australia to give 'pet-moms' the same flexible working opportunities as regular moms.

"Call me barking mad if you want, but not all of us will have kids, and I’m not ashamed to say that we also need space to dote on our dogs, cats and hell even pet lizards," she wrote.

Unsurprisingly, the article has managed to ignite a social media debate where many people think Mary was way out of line for deserving the same benefits as working moms.

"[Dogs] are NOT the same as having a child and you need to get some things into perspective if you think having a DOG is the same as having a child," one wrote.

"This is ridiculous and distracts from the real issue of the challenges mums (and working parents generally) face re-entering the work force," another commented, adding: "You are entitled to flexibility, but this just makes a mockery of what should be a serious issue."

One person even argued that Mary is causing harm to her dog by not leaving him alone. "Your behavior could potentially harm your dog. You are setting him up for problems with separation anxiety," they wrote.

But there were many who agree with Mary. 

One person addressed her critics, writing: "Who are you to denounce someone's choice for wanting a fur child over a human one? Who are you to assume every female has a working uterus? Why should those who cannot have human children be discriminated against because they have a fur child? Why should females who cannot or do not want human children be treated any less than those who choose to be baby makers?"

Another commented that having a pet was "no difference to a kid, the same level of love and commitment and less hassle! Humans are not that special!!"